Part of my overall prepping plans is to have enough firearms for friends and family members who bug out to my location. I live in a rural area with privately owned that borders national forest and timber company land.
Hunting firearms is not a problem, the issue is handguns.
The Lucky Gunner youtube channel usually puts out some good videos, but I must say this one probably takes the cake. The guy talking in the video uses various examples with one being from the 1930s where it is suggested that police officers double action only revolvers. Jjust 1/8 inch of trigger pull can cause the single action handgun to discharge.
Arguments made against single action handguns can also be made against striker fired handguns.
No way to decock the handgun. In the case of striker-fired there is no way to lower the striker without clearing the handgun and pulling the trigger.
Shorter trigger pull than double action.
Now that the argument against single action and striker fired handguns has been made, what are your thoughts?
We have example spanning back 70 years saying that double action is safer than single action and that should apply to striker-fired as well.
In 1982 when Glock hit the streets it was thrown to the forefront of the gun control battle by having a polymer frame. The anti-gun leftist claimed a Glock would slip past airport metal detectors. The anti-gun media did one thing, they gave Glock all the free advertising the company could want.
From 1982 – 1986 I was in high school. Something teenagers did back then is we watched the news. Video games were far and few between. There was no internet, smart phone or tablet. there was no Netflix, Youtube, Hulu or amazon prime. The vast majority of people had 3 or 4 TV channels we picked up with an antenna. From 5:30 – 6:30 the only thing to do was watch the news. So watch the news we did.
Even after I graduated high school in 1986 I remember the anti-gunners beating the gun control drum over the Glock.
Forgotten Weapons has a wonderful youtube channel. Ian goes out to auction houses, and then does videos about the unique and forgotten weapons up for auction. He also does some tidbits of information, such as why the safety of the AR/M16 is the way it it. Which I thought was pretty cool.
The gospel of Browning talks about how people add all kinds of unneeded garbage to their handguns. To what end does the extra “stuff” serve? Only to add weight and more stuff to break?
If we have something that works, why beat the drum for something else? The 1911 has proved its value through two world wars and numerous conflicts all over the world. Yet the 1911 is losing respect because it is old? If something works, it works. Age is of little relevance.
This is a wonderful video that talks about past and present handguns.
Man oh man, what a weekend. My wife and I left Jasper Texas around 6 am Friday morning, got breakfast at Jack in the box in Woodville Texas, and arrived at the NRA show at the 9 am. Traffic was not that bad. thank goodness there were no wrecks on HWY 59.
We found a parking lot directly in front of Minute Maid park, which is across from the George R Brown convention center. Holy crap was parking expensive, we had to pay $30, but the location was perfect.
My wife and I entered the show, obtained our media badges, then started walking around.
This was my wifes first real gun show. She never showed any interest in gun shows, that was until I built her a pink M4. Now that she has something she can relate to she is showing more interest.
James Yeager on youtube made a couple of interesting video about the 1911. One of the point is when the 1911 was designed, gun companies employed craftsman who knew what they were doing. Today, gun companies are about production and the bottom line. CNC machines mill out the parts, then the firearm is assembled.
After watching that first video, I said “yep, that is my Remington 1911 R1.”
The first time I took my Remington 1911 R1 out to the sand pit, it had a failure rate of close to 8%. Meaning, out of the first 100 rounds, the handgun had around 8 failures.
In the 1980s there were three events that helped influence my opinion on handguns and handgun calibers.
#1 – My dad and I were having a discussion on a revolver vs a pistol. Even though a revolver holds fewer rounds then a pistol, my dad liked the revolver over pistol the due to the reliability of the revolver. There was nothing to jam with the revolver like there is with a pistol.
My dad worked as a Jasper County Texas deputy sheriff during the 1970s. Even though I greatly respect his opinion, I feel that his opinion might have been influenced by organizations like the FBI who used a service revolver instead of a pistol like the 1911.
The service revolver my dad used was a S&W model 66 combat magnum. When I graduated high school in 1986, mom and dad bought me a model 66 combat magnum just like dads.
There were two major sticking points on the revolver vs pistol discussion my dad and I had. Those points where the effectiveness of the 357 magnum, and the reliability of the revolver.
If you are going to use a handgun, make sure its reliable and make sure the cartridge is large enough to get the job done.