Something that caught my eye the other day on youtube, the topic was the new Sig 320 being adopted. Someone said the military needed to get rid of the outdated Beretta design and go with something more modern.
Then the person said something along the lines of “modern like a glock.” Or otherwise implied Glock is a modern design.
I started laughing and thought to myself the guy in the video knows nothing of handgun history.
Take a safety feature off a chainsaw and you are asking fro trouble. Yet, Glock fanboys justify the Glock not having a safety?
Your finger is not a safety. There is an old saying, “always assume the presence of a belly button.” Which means we are all human and we all make mistakes. Safeties are there to compensate for mistakes. Except for Glocks, they do not have a safety and thus do not compensate for when people make mistakes.
I never cared for the look of a Glock, or the fact that they are made out of a polymer instead of aluminum or steel. While some of my buddies jumped on the glock bandwagon a decade ago, I stayed with the Beretta 92F and more recently the Remington 1911 R1.
To ensure that the group is constant in some of the firearms we own, I decided to buy a Glock. The one I am looking at is the Glock 19.
Several months ago some of my buddies and I went to a shooting range in southeast Texas. They arranged their Glocks on the table and let me test fire several of them. The one I liked the best was the Glock 19.
The 19 fits the bill as a lightweight handgun that I can carry while working around the farm. Something that I can carry while running a chainsaw, or brush hogging with the tractor. A handgun that stays out of the way, lightweight and chambered in 9mm.